Twitter Action

(This record review appeared in the Village Voice and Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

through-the-panamaEinstürzende Neubauten, electro, the Jesus and Mary Chain, minimal techno, Suicide, Iannis Xenakis, and electric Miles — what a list, right? Not only is Through the Panama, Sightings’ sixth album since 2002, a post-everything fusion of all these jammers, it’s a new form of modern rock. Thirty years from now, stoned heads will worship this static-soaked slab like some kind of White Light/White Heat for the age of melted polar icecaps.

That’s serious hyperbole, no doubt about it. But it’s been years (Six Finger Satellite’s Severe Exposure in 1995?) since an underground rock band has dropped an album this heavy, noisy, experimental, and… catchy. For years, Sightings were considered the scuzz-rock stepchildren of New York — far more difficult even than the mercurial Gang Gang Dance. But the group has now caught up with Liars and Animal Collective in terms of transforming extreme sounds into barbed hooks and power-drill dance grooves; producer Andrew W.K. (remember him?) deserves a lot of the credit, presiding over an immaculately chiseled recording that vibrates with phantom electricity, fourth-dimension overdubs, and knotted texture.

Ultimately, though, success hinges upon singer-guitarist Mark Morgan, bassist Richard Hoffman, and digital drummer Jon Lockie. While these guys breathe fire like a trio of ’50s jazzbos (dig Hoffman’s latticework runs on “Perforated”), they use all that burned oxygen to illuminate a set of deeply gothic compositions boasting more pointed arches and vertical piers than Notre Dame. And if that’s not enough, Sightings even cover a Walker Brothers tune, “The Electrician,” which will have you slowly howling “and kill me and kill me and kill me” for the next six months.

Post to Twitter

(This record review appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine and the Broward-Palm Beach New Times.)

new seasonsThe cover to New Seasons — a rural landscape dipped in shades of electric raspberry — looks a lot like the jacket for Charley D. and Milo’s 1970 debut LP, a lost treasure in lysergic country pop. That’s not surprising. The Sadies, as their sixth studio album clearly demonstrates, retain an encyclopedic knowledge of cosmic American music, one that runs far deeper than merely nicking tricks from the Byrds.

The Sadies, you see, aren’t bad actors like Beachwood Sparks. The Canadian outfit doesn’t dress up like cowboys and simply add a little reverb-soaked pedal steel to pedestrian indie pop. Sure, New Seasons is drenched in moody atmospherics and whispering harmonies reminiscent of ’90s dream pop; “The Trial” and “Anna Leigh,” in particular, ripple and float like a stoned hike through the Metroparks. The disc also gallops like a pack of movie outlaws wandering the high plains to Ennio Morricone (as well as some Dick Dale).

But New Seasons never feels like cheap cinema. That’s because the Sadies are skilled musicians who understand the key to classic country rock. Guitarists Dallas and Travis Good don’t strum — they pick… all the time. While that sounds like a minor difference maker, it ain’t. Country picking is the earth from which everything else sprouts. And in the Sadies’ case, what comes up is a kaleidoscopic field of wild flowers and poppies.

Post to Twitter

(This record review originally appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

buds-of-mayTurner Cody is commonly associated with “antifolk.” This is a nebulous gaggle of singer-songwriters from New York who enjoy subverting the American folk tradition with big-city irony and indie amateurism.

But there’s nothing “anti” about Cody’s folk. While he does appear on Rough Trade’s 2002 compilation Antifolk, Vol. 1, he isn’t an urban novelty self-consciously dicking around with folk music. Rather, he’s one of these out-of-time oddballs, like the Holy Modal Rounders or Jimmy Cousins, who really should’ve been born before the Depression.

Buds of May, Cody’s eighth album, isn’t quite as satisfying as 2005′s The Great Migration. But it does flow with more of Cody’s literary gobbledygook and cryptic narratives conflating the nonsensical and profound. The singer and guitarist definitely has a bit of early Dylan in him, except his image isn’t that of a neo-Guthrie populist. He’s an oil tycoon’s black-sheep nephew — a Tin Pan Alley drunkard with a cynic’s mind and a wounded heart.

But that’s all a bit heavy, for Buds of May as well as The Great Migration succeed because Cody surrounded himself with the perfect little jazz-folk combo. He’s a folkie who understands the importance of lyrics and music.

Post to Twitter

(This column originally appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

burn-baby-burnBurn Baby Burn is one of those mysterious LPs shrouded in rumor and legend, with a muddled backstory that’s been handed down for four decades: In November of 1968, two Cleveland musicians — trumpeter Norman Howard and searing saxophonist Joe Phillips — recorded the disc for ESP-DISK’, an iconoclastic free jazz and experimental rock label.

The title supposedly refers to the infamous inner-city riots of that year, when Cleveland and a long list of American cities literally combusted with alienation. Tired of getting shit upon, of institutional racism, of police harassment and brutality, black people took to the streets. Musicians took to their instruments.

Over Burn Baby Burn’s eight tracks, Howard, Phillips, and their accompanying rhythm section channel that rage, firing off sonic bullets and squealing with paranoia. And when they’re not razing Cleveland to the ground, the quartet descends into some of the most ominous and haunting jazz ambience of the modern era.

But for reasons that have long been unclear, ESP didn’t release Burn Baby Burn, and Howard and Phillips apparently dropped off the face of the planet. Then ESP closed shop.

A short essay on this Cleveland treasure appeared in “Great Lost Recordings,” a 2004 cover story for the English music magazine The Wire. Burn Baby Burn, according to writer David Keenan, “stands as the major unreleased document of late-’60s energy music.” That’s a major statement, because the ’60s stands as free jazz’s high-water mark, the heyday of John Coltrane, Ornette Coleman, Eric Dolphy, Sun Ra, Cecil Taylor, and C-Town’s mythical Albert Ayler, a revolutionary sax man who died in 1970.

Fortunately, in 2005, ESP restarted, and the label finally released Burn Baby Burn this year. Unfortunately, this doesn’t mean BBB has now been found or that it’s any less a mystery.

Sure, the mass-produced CD, available on Amazon.com, is a vast improvement over the record’s only other manifestation: a limited-edition cassette from the ’80s. But unlike 2004′s Holy Ghost — an über-informative 10-disc retrospective and book about Ayler, put out by the archival specialists at Revenant — ESP’s package fails to shed any real light on Howard and Phillips, or Cleveland’s free music scene, one of America’s most fertile in the ’60s.

Phillips (who converted to Islam and adopted the name Yusef Munim Phillips) contributes some enlightening reminiscences of mid-’60s Cleveland and its allegedly corrupt police force. But the liner notes are as jumbled as a bowl of alphabet soup. It’s damn near impossible to discern who’s writing what; the label broke Phillips’ words up and mingled them willy-nilly with other artists’. (That said, we do learn that Henry Rollins is a huge fan of Burn Baby Burn. His imprint, 2.13.61, tried to release it in the late ’90s, but failed.)

The screwups aren’t surprising. ESP-DISK’ has long been seen as a shadowy and controversial underground label. Over the years, several of its artists, including ’60s folk-icon Peter Stampfel, have claimed that owner Bernard Stollman failed to pay royalties, released recordings without permission, and pulled other stunts.

When I call ESP’s Brooklyn office, it’s Stollman himself who answers. But he only casts more shadows when I ask about Burn Baby Burn and the 40-year delay of its release. He claims he didn’t release the album in ’68 because the “Nixon administration” ran the label out of business for its anti-war stance.

But The Wire’s Keenan says Stollman is rewriting history. The mercurial label owner didn’t release BBB the first time around, Keenan says, because he thought it too primitive. “If Stollman is gonna re-release it, he can hardly admit that he rejected it at the time,” he says via e-mail from the U.K. “Time scale-wise, there were things recorded later that went out on the label, so saying it got shut down by the ‘Nixon administration’ seems like a canny bit of mythology and historical rewrite.”

Of course, the best people to answer this are the two musicians who actually made Burn Baby Burn: Howard and Phillips. But no one can put me in touch with them. Stollman says Howard still lives in Cleveland, but is basically unreachable; supposedly, he too converted to Islam and changed his name. Phillips lives in Florida, Stollman says; he offers to contact him for me, but I never hear back from him or the saxophonist. Even respected music writer Roy Morris says he’ll forward my contact info to Phillips, but he can’t promise a response.

Their silence raises interesting questions: Did their problems with ESP sour them on the music biz? Or does this violent music represent painful times they’ve basically avoided since ’68? If pain is the issue, Howard and Phillips aren’t the only ones; there are numerous musicians, artists, and activists still grappling with what went down during that volatile era.

Either way, Burn Baby Burn is a landmark in the local music scene, and we should acknowledge it as such — even if we can’t thank the Clevelanders who made it.

Post to Twitter

(This record review originally appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

betty1:30 a.m.: The bartender cuts you off. Stumbling out of the john waving your wand all over the place, demanding another shot of tequila or else, was the last straw. But you couldn’t help yourself. Playing “Roadhouse Blues” on the jukebox 23 times in a row makes a man feel invincible and free. On a Tuesday night, in a bar with four patrons, you’re on top of the world.

2:15 a.m.: You’re back home… pissing all over your Doors records. You blame the Lizard King for no more tequila fun-time. Afterward, however, you stumble across a dusty bottle of Pepe Lopez Gold in your sock drawer. Of course, Morrison Hotel is lying on the living-room floor, soaked in urine. That means no “Roadhouse Blues.” So you crank Handful, the new reissue of Betty’s 1971 LP. It’s the perfect stand-in: The cover sports a pair of tattooed hands squeezing sweet ass, and the singer, like a true Californian, sounds exactly like Morrison. Hell, he even coos, “Sweet loving woman, you know what I need” and “You better stop your lowdown ways” on five or six songs that all sound just like “Roadhouse Blues.” But that’s cool because the Doors rule — and so does Betty.

Post to Twitter

(This record review originally appeared in the Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

mammalMammal ain’t the happiest kid on the block. His last disc, 2006′s Let Me Die, a collection of post-industrial “dance” grooves, pulsates with all the vibrancy of a euthanized hippopotamus.

Lonesome Drifter, its follow-up, offers an equally desolate soundscape. This time around, however, Mammal (born Gary Beauvais) trades minimal beat-work for lo-fi doom built from skeletal riffage and a smacked-out drum machine. So yeah, Mammal’s latest, which opens with a 10-minute dirge titled “Repulsion,” traffics in dour, primitive shit. Several music scribes have already declared it the soundtrack for modern urban decline (which makes total sense, since the guy calls Detroit home).

But Lonesome Drifter is far smarter than its wastoid-on-a-bummer facade. Beauvais obviously understands American folk mythology. What we have here is a four-part tale, starring a 21st-century antihero who’s a cross between Hank William’s Luke the Drifter and the longhair brooding silently in the back of the classroom. In a hollow baritone, this rootless outsider croaks about leaving family behind, “breathing in fumes,” and the dreary repetition of everyday life.

This is some truly archetypal stuff. In another age, Mammal would’ve made this music with a banjo. Instead he plays electric axe like Buzz Osbourne.

Post to Twitter

(This record review originally appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine.)

fraser-deboltFallout is hawking its highly anticipated reissue of Fraser & DeBolt’s 1971 debut to the freak-folk scene. According to the back cover, the Canadian duo is “sure to delight fans of… Devendra Banhart and Joanna Newsom.”

But here’s the problem with that: Banhart and company, however experimental, are neo-hippies making lush stoner music. Fraser & DeBolt, in contrast, were aggro folkies with a crude, proto-indie vision. They didn’t strum acoustic guitars; they mangled them. And that’s partly the reason why they flopped commercially in the Age of Aquarius, despite recording for Columbia.

With an austere production that’s the antithesis of back-to-the-land cozy, the duo’s axes stutter like broken drum machines. Allan Fraser croons the sullen ballads, including “The Waltz of the Tennis Players,” recently covered by Meg Baird. Daisy DeBolt shares in the tender moments, but primarily steers their avant-jams, screeching and moaning like a mutant hybrid of Linda Perry and Yoko Ono. Then there’s this Ian Guenther dude, who plays a jagged and often atonal fiddle.

At times, as on “Old Man on the Corner,” Fraser & DeBolt With Ian Guenther can be a downright shrill listen. But there’s no denying the raw emotion of this rediscovered gem.

Post to Twitter

(This feature/column originally appeared in Cleveland’s Scene magazine. Interviewing Graham Nash was really kind of cool, even if he did cut me off in mid-sentence to say goodbye and hang up.)

crosby-nashDavid Crosby and Graham Nash have been cock-teasing Cleveland for most of 2007. The duo was originally scheduled to appear at the Allen Theatre last March. But they had to cancel. While en route, Crosby ate a KFC Famous Bowl (chicken and biscuit, I believe) and was rushed to the ER for a colonoscopy.

Just joking. He actually underwent surgery for a torn rotator cuff and, according to Nash, feels great these days. “He’s been doing rehab since the operation,” says Nash. “I haven’t noticed him registering any pain when playing his guitar. So he’s fine. We’re ready to go.”

The duo is on the third day of rehearsals for its 28-date fall tour, which will arrive at the Palace Theatre on October 7.

Not to sound totally bush-league, but rapping with a Woodstock icon like Nash is a trip. First off, he calls me. “Hello, Graham Nash here,” he says in a raspy British accent, as if I’ve never heard of the guy.

Secondly, Nash isn’t the laid-back hippie you’d expect; he’s more like a veteran television personality. Every line uttered is a perfectly sculpted sound bite for an A&E documentary on ’60s pop. “With the Hollies,” he says, referring to his original band, a legend in its own right, “we were just five kids from the North of England who escaped having to do what our fathers did: work in the mill or work down in the mines.”

In all honesty, I originally asked for an interview with Crosby. Not only did he recently release Voyage, a career-spanning boxed set; he also gave fans an overdue remastering of If I Could Only Remember My Name, his solo debut from 1971. The record sounds unlike anything else in Crosby’s discography. It flopped upon release, but has gone on to become a cult classic of the psychedelic era. Drifting through stoned disillusionment and hazy folk rock, it’s every bit as harrowing as Neil Young’s On the Beach, one of rock’s classic downer records. What’s more, Crosby has said very little about this mysterious album in the last 36 years (and we all know how the ex-Byrd loves talking about himself).

Unfortunately, Crosby must’ve won a coin toss or a game of rock-paper-scissors, because Nash is the official spokesman for their fall tour. This was a bummer at first. Like a lot of rock fans throughout the years, I’ve always dismissed Nash as the resident soft-rock sap in Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. Sure, the lucky bastard earns serious cred for bagging a goddess like Joni Mitchell in 1969. But he also penned “Our House” and “Teach Your Children,” the kind of sentimental pap that makes us feel dirty for humming along (which we always do).

Nevertheless, I boned up for our interview by dusting off a few of Nash’s old records, and believe it or not, they’re far better than anything he ever contributed to CSN&Y. His first two LPs, 1971′s Songs for Beginners (remastered in 2001) and Wild Tales (released two years later) sound totally modern. Both records are self-produced and boast a hook-laden fusion of shimmering Brit-pop and pastoral folk rock, recalling indie bands like Vetiver, Dr. Dog, Blur, the M’s, and Guided by Voices.

These discs, interestingly enough, met cool receptions in the early ’70s. They were too uncomplicated at a time when critics demanded bloated epics like Stephen Stills’ Manassas (which nowadays moves like a lumbering dinosaur). “I try to keep things as simple as possible,” says Nash. He nails why his solo work has aged so well: Timelessness is found in simplicity.

On 2004′s Crosby Nash, only the duo’s fourth studio album since 1972, Nash basically props up his good buddy with a set of well-crafted pop tunes, many of which he captured with a smart, retro-styled production.

Nash is currently working on his own boxed set, a treatment I now believe his solo career clearly demands. While he never made a record quite as visionary as If I Could Only Remember My Name, he has proved the most consistent member of CSN&Y not named Neil Young. And that says a lot.

Post to Twitter

© 2010 Justin F. Farrar Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.7.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.